Is your fundraising strategic – or just busy? →

Chasing every RFP and donor lead can feel productive, but reactive fundraising costs you in burnout, mission drift and low-probability bets. Here is how to tell whether your fundraising is genuinely strategic – plus a quick self-check and two templates to get more intentional.

August 26, 2026

At a glance

  • Reactive fundraising is costly: chasing every request for proposal (RFP) or donor lead can result in burnout, mission drift, and time spent on low-probability opportunities (cold RFP win rates are often under 5%, versus 50%+ for invited proposals).
  • Strategic organizations know their numbers: they know their overhead costs, budgets, and secured revenue so they can see their actual funding gap.
  • Saying “no” is strategic (and hard): declining poorly aligned opportunities frees up time for cultivating major donors and deepening relationships with funders who already believe in your organization’s work.
  • Three concrete starting points: develop a fundraising “pipeline tracker” (template below); invest in stewarding existing funders (not just reporting to them); and pause before saying yes by asking whether an opportunity fits strategy, capacity, and what it displaces.

For many organizations, fundraising can feel like an endless cycle of responding to the next opportunity. A Request for Proposal (due in a couple days!) appears in your inbox. A board member mentions a potential donor you should learn about. You see a call for proposals on LinkedIn that seems close enough to your work. Before long, your carefully planned week has been replaced by a scramble to chase the next opportunity.

If this sounds familiar, you’re not alone.

The reality is that fundraising at many organizations operates reactively, not because leaders lack vision, but because they lack the time, capacity, or systems to be more intentional with their teams about fundraising. When you’re balancing programs, finances, staffing, and fundraising, it’s easy to let external opportunities and pressures dictate your priorities.

But it’s important (and ultimately cost- and time-saving) to ask yourself:

Is your fundraising strategy proactive or reactive? Strategic or opportunistic?

There’s nothing wrong with being opportunistic. Sometimes an unexpected funding opportunity is exactly what your organization needs. The problem arises when those opportunities become your primary strategy instead of supporting it.

A reactive fundraising approach often looks like:

  • Applying for grants because they’re available, not because they’re the best fit for your organization (e.g. small grants that won’t help you achieve much, scopes of work not aligned to your strategic plan, burdensome reporting requirements).
  • Pursuing every potential donor conversation, regardless of alignment (e.g. chasing a donor who is very clearly interested in species, landscapes or countries that are not a match for your work).
  • Constantly working against unplanned external deadlines rather than your own priorities (spoiler alert: reactive fundraising leads to burnout!).
  • Spending more time writing proposals than cultivating long-term relationships. Submitting a proposal “cold” to a public RFP often has an extremely low win rate (<1 to 5%), whereas if a donor has invited you to submit, you can hope the likelihood it is funded is over 50%.

Over time, a reactive or solely opportunistic approach creates inefficiency, staff burnout, and even mission drift. Staff spend valuable hours on low-probability opportunities. Programs morph to fit funder interests, deviating from the organization’s true mission and strategic plan. Donor stewardship suffers because all available energy goes toward acquiring the next gift.

Strategic versus reactive fundraising

Instead of asking, “What funding is available?” strategic organizations ask, “What funding do we actually need to achieve our mission, and who is most likely to invest in that vision?”


Strategic fundraising flips this dynamic

Rather than pursuing every opportunity, develop clear fundraising priorities to guide your efforts.

  • Know what you need: they identify the funding mix needed to sustain their work (e.g. varied grant lengths, diverse donors, and the right unrestricted–restricted revenue balance).
  • Know the costs: they know the financial basics, such as:

    • Overhead – the running costs of keeping the organization open (staff, rent, admin) that aren’t tied to a specific project
    • Projected annual expenditure
    • Revenue already secured for the fiscal year
    • How likely each remaining funding prospect actually is to materialize
  • Know the funders: they understand which funders are aligned with their mission from smart research, like examining a foundation’s public financial information or networking “behind the scenes” with allies.
  • Know the people: they proactively build relationships long before a proposal is due, and they cultivate current donors beyond the simple parameters of a grant agreement.

But perhaps most importantly, they become comfortable saying “no.” Know when to say “no.”

Saying no to a poorly aligned opportunity can feel risky, especially for smaller organizations. But every proposal and relationship requires time – time that could be invested in cultivating a major donor, strengthening stewardship, improving grant reporting, or deepening relationships with funders who already believe in your work.

Strategic fundraising isn’t about doing more. It’s about doing fewer things better.

Being strategic doesn’t eliminate uncertainty. Fundraising will always involve responding to changing circumstances and unexpected opportunities. But when your strategy provides the foundation – and you have a clear sense of your financial needs and priorities – you can evaluate those opportunities through the lens of your mission and long-term financial health instead of short-sighted pressure.

A quick fundraising strategy check

Take a moment to rate your organization on each of the following statements using a scale of 1 (Rarely/No) to 5 (Almost Always/Yes).

  1. At the beginning of each year (or earlier), we have a sense of how much our annual expenditure/costs will be for the year.
  2. We have a sense of what our secured revenue is for the year – and what our gap is between that amount and our projected costs.
  3. We decline opportunities that don’t align with our mission or strategy.
  4. We dedicate time each month to donor stewardship, not just solicitation.
  5. We regularly review and update our fundraising progress in a shared document or platform.
  6. We know our overhead costs and are mindful of that when considering budget development and fundraising.
  7. Proposals and their budgets are developed as a team and not by just one person.
  8. We can clearly articulate our funding priorities for the next 12–24 months.

Scoring your results

32–40: Your fundraising program is largely strategic. Continue refining your approach and protecting time for relationship-building!

20–31: You’re balancing strategy with reactivity. Look for one or two areas where you can be more intentional and make a plan with your team on how to improve in this area.

Below 20: (It’s okay, you’re not alone!) Your team may be spending too much time responding to opportunities instead of creating a plan to pursue the right ones. Your organization may also need more clarity from the financial side in order to inform smarter fundraising efforts.

3 ways to become more intentional (including useful templates to guide you)

You don’t need a complete fundraising overhaul to become more intentional. Start with these three steps.

1. Refine your funder pipeline and clarify your financial outlook

A clear “pipeline tracker” or other document/platform that clearly lays out your secured and prospective fundraising opportunities is essential. If you do not have such a document, this should be a priority. The tracker should contain essential pieces of information related to your funding opportunities, including award amount, timeline, and person responsible. Ideally, it is tied to your expenditure so that you can know what your fundraising gap is.

It should be updated at least monthly and used as a team resource for everyone involved in fundraising efforts, such as the Executive Director, Finance Manager, and Programs Director. A template of this type of document is here.

2. Review and prioritize relationship-building with your current funders

Take a hard look at your existing (secured) funders – listed in your pipeline document mentioned above – and consider with your team how you may be able to grow that relationship beyond grant-required reports. Maybe they love data and you can send them a friendly email along with a new impact report. Maybe they introduced you to a new contact earlier this year and you finally had a call with that person to network. Send a short thank you email to your funder for having brokered that introduction, and show that you followed through on it.

3. Create a “pause before yes” habit

As mentioned above, saying “no” to a funding opportunity or Request for Proposal can feel risky – but it is often important to do. Before pursuing a new grant or donor opportunity, ask three simple questions:

  • Does this align with our strategic priorities?
  • Do we have the capacity to pursue it well?
  • If we say yes to this, what are we saying no to?

If the answers aren’t clear, it may not be the right opportunity. A template to assess “fit” of RFPs for your team to use is here.

You might also like

Get the Reader in your inbox every month →

More of the Maliasili Reader →

Maliasili exists to help talented local conservation organizations overcome their challenges and constraints so that they can become more effective agents of change in their landscapes, communities, and nations.

Subscribe to our Quarterly Newsletter

Sign up with your email address to receive news and updates.
We respect your privacy.

© Maliasili 2014 - 2026

4 Carmichael St, Suite 111-193, Essex Junction, VT 05452

Maliasili is designated as a public charity (501c3) organization by the Internal Revenue Service.